Here, as noted above, our definition of
becomes
arbitrary. However, by a change of variables to
|
x = |
(9) |
t =
|
(10) |
Examination of the general solution (Eq. 4)
shows that for very large
,
k becomes irrelevant: if r is small enough that the term
in
becomes comparable to unity, then 3kr
1, whereas
if 3kr > 1 then the term in
dominates. Thus these cases
are actually equivalent to the cases where
= ±
.
This is a similar situation to the previous one: there are two functional forms, depending on the sign of k. For k = + 1 there is the `cycloid' universe
|
|
(11) |
|
|
(12) |
This corresponds to just one universe, the Einstein-de Sitter case. This is a scale-free solution, i.e. there is no characteristic time or size; instead the density is a unique function of time (or vice versa); our integral solution reduces to
t = = |
(13) |
There are also six special cases when the matter density is strictly zero.
There is a trivial empty static universe when k = 0 and
= 0,
in which case H = 0. This can be thought of as the limit of the
Einstein-de Sitter universe when
t
.
Next is the Milne solution,
when
= 0 and k = - 1 (to make H2 positive) and hence
| R = ct. | (14) |
In the de Sitter solution k = 0 and
> 0. The Hubble parameter is then constant at
|
H2 = |
(15) |
|
t = |
(16) |
The other three cases correspond to both
and k non-zero:
note that for M* = 0,
![]()
0, k = + 1, is ruled out because it
would give a negative H2 (similarly
< 0, k = 0).
For all these R
sets the absolute
scale, and there are no continuous parameters that affect the shape.
To summarize the M* = 0 cases:
| k | Rturn | Type | |
| < 0 | -1 |
(- 3 |
Bang-crunch. |
| 0 | 0 | - | Static |
| 0 | -1 | - | Milne: Linear Expansion |
| > 0 | -1 | - | Continuous expansion |
| > 0 | 0 | 0 | de Sitter: Exponential expansion |
| > 0 | +1 |
(3 |
Bounce |